The actual debunk of Anarchism that Engels will never tell you

“Anarchism, which mandates that there are no hierarchies, requires that individuals communicate and discuss with each other in a completely un-hierarchical fashion, such that an individual’s actions are determined by the bulk of his discussions. This means it has O(n^2) complexity”

“Democratic Centralism, on the other hand, which uses a system of cascading-upwards Local People’s Congress, relies upon limited group-sizes in order to achieve the same results of organization. Hence, it has O(log n) complexity”

These two statements are enough to destroy Anarchism. You do not need Engels’s nonsensical rambling series of case studies of captains and such which Anarchists don’t even accept as a “proper debunk” so much so as a “complete misunderstanding of anarchism”.

The fate of all Engelist-Luxembourgist-Trotskyist-Sanderist-Bidenists is that they will never actually accomplish anything except cement the usury imperialist apparatus and subvert goyim, because they don’t actually put math in their so-called “theory”.

Math is important, yes? For something to be a science, it must be mathematical in nature. There is no science in existence without at least a bit of mathematics. Even Marx puts equations in the first page of Das Kapital (most likely because Marx is in fact an antisemite, and hence is code-bound to put bell curves or other mathematical relationships in everything whereby the X axis is IQ or whatever). Math allows you to completely and utterly wreck Anarchism to any mathematically-inclined individual. In fact, I do not believe that you can be both an Anarchist and also write good, performant code at the same time, because Anarchism is the very definition of inefficient, garbage code.